| | 1 | International IRS and strategy discussion meeting |
| | 2 | 3rd September |
| | 3 | Skype |
| | 4 | |
| | 5 | Filipa |
| | 6 | Ben |
| | 7 | Ed |
| | 8 | |
| | 9 | ACTIONS |
| | 10 | ~~~~~~~~ |
| | 11 | Ed provide Ben with workflow diagrams in powerpoint presentation |
| | 12 | Ed put Jim in direct contact with Ben while Ed on holiday to brief/support/coach Ben |
| | 13 | Ben/Filipa: confirm strategic information/tech direction for national hubs and information |
| | 14 | Ben/Filipa: try to find and confirm one country to trial the IIRS in a beta at the national hubs meeting |
| | 15 | |
| | 16 | Background: |
| | 17 | ~~~~~~~~~ |
| | 18 | Big picture proposal: |
| | 19 | http://www.transitionnetwork.org/blogs/ed-mitchell/2013-08/web-strategy-big-picture-explanation |
| | 20 | |
| | 21 | Tactical - IIRS - workflows: |
| | 22 | http://www.transitionnetwork.org/blogs/ed-mitchell/2013-08/international-initiative-registration-service-workflows |
| | 23 | |
| | 24 | Meeting notes: |
| | 25 | ~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| | 26 | 1. Get clarification on the proposal |
| | 27 | 2. See if the national hubs would be interested |
| | 28 | 3. Ben/Filipa - are they happy to share this with the national hubs |
| | 29 | 4. What Ed and Jim want |
| | 30 | 5. Budgets |
| | 31 | |
| | 32 | |
| | 33 | 1. Clarification - anything can be clarified? |
| | 34 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| | 35 | Drupal 6 and 7 operating at the same time? |
| | 36 | - yes |
| | 37 | - data will be synchronised between two sites |
| | 38 | - drupal 7 will be the local site which will be the widget which will show in the national hub site |
| | 39 | |
| | 40 | Don't want to dictate anything |
| | 41 | - key goal of web project - develop an international initiative directory |
| | 42 | - this has been identified by the hubs at an early meeting |
| | 43 | - Ben feels that tech integration will be welcomed |
| | 44 | -- bigger picture will be happy |
| | 45 | - Filipa - this position is general from the hubs - strategic vision |
| | 46 | -- only key issue - other systems |
| | 47 | --- sweden, brazil, germany, us - incumbent systems |
| | 48 | -- would lead to separate conversation track |
| | 49 | |
| | 50 | What systems to use - For new hubs - there is a live question - |
| | 51 | - this is a good moment to have that conversation |
| | 52 | - there will be 1 hour on IT - with hub technical people |
| | 53 | |
| | 54 | Democratic model: |
| | 55 | - This tech proposal also has significant power structure suggestions |
| | 56 | -- TN not as the top of a decision making pyramid - being part of a growing International tech and data group sharing decisions |
| | 57 | --- this fits int0 with TN's ongoing discussions around power and responsibility on friday meeting |
| | 58 | |
| | 59 | 2. National hubs interested? |
| | 60 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| | 61 | There is already a political agreement that having a international initiatives directory is the way to go - so the strategic goal is agreed |
| | 62 | Tactically - there will be key doubts because of systems in use already - so there will be some work at a 'lower' level over the next few years |
| | 63 | |
| | 64 | 3. Ben and Filipa - happy? |
| | 65 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| | 66 | Makes sense for them |
| | 67 | - Ben need a presentation and pictures to talk about |
| | 68 | - demo would be fantastic |
| | 69 | - Ben going to need some coaching |
| | 70 | -- Jim will be in direct with Ben to help coach |
| | 71 | -- Docs will be in wiki: https://tech.transitionnetwork.org/trac/wiki/IIRS |
| | 72 | -- Ed will provide Ben with powerpoint of the screengrabs |
| | 73 | |
| | 74 | Sharing in advance |
| | 75 | - now? or at meet? |
| | 76 | - in a dossier before the meet? |
| | 77 | - AGREED: both will share the information in some form in a bigger dossier before the meet (tbc) |
| | 78 | |
| | 79 | 4. What do Ed and Jim want? |
| | 80 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| | 81 | 1. Approval and/or discussion of strategy and tactical idea (IIRS) |
| | 82 | 2. country to do a beta trial |
| | 83 | |
| | 84 | What is needed from a country? |
| | 85 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| | 86 | Administrator (and colleague if suitable) from a settled national hub (i.e. a group with established identity and processes) will need to be able to: |
| | 87 | |
| | 88 | - translate the language that the widget uses in its workflow |
| | 89 | - embed a widget into the national hub website |
| | 90 | - respond to emails when initiatives are added |
| | 91 | - moderate applications for initiative applications (simple 'confirm'/'deny' option - NOT a power based thing, just for spam/sense checking) |
| | 92 | |
| | 93 | 5. Budgets |
| | 94 | ~~~~~~~~~ |
| | 95 | - £7K budget to get to beta product with one country |
| | 96 | - this will inform us |
| | 97 | -- cost to produce another language |
| | 98 | -- administrative roles and responsibilities |
| | 99 | -- any design changes that are suitable |